Список литературы
1. Кобазев В.Э. Клинико-морфологическое обоснование применения сетки титановой для армирующей пластики мягких тканей в реконструктивной челюстно-лицевой хирургии // Сборник тезисов: VI Национальный конгресс “Пластическая хирургия, эстетическая медицина и косметология”. - 2017. - С. 50.
2. Weyhe D., Belyaev O., Muller C., Meurer K., Bauer K., Papapstolou G., Uhl W. (2007) Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of the light meshes: a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg 31:234-244.
3. Asarias J.R., Nguyen P.T., Jr Mings, Gerrich A.P., Pierce L.M. (2001) Influence of mesh materials on the expression of mediators involved in wound healing. Invest Surg 24:87-98.
4. Pascual G., Herna´ndez-Gasco´n B, Rodrı´guez M., Sotomayor S., Pen˜a E., Calvo B., Bello´n J.M. (2012) The long-term behavior of lightweight and heavyweight meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects is determined by host tissue repair process provoked by the mesh. Surgery 152(5):886-895.
5. Diegelmann R.F., Evans M.C. Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic, and delayed healing. Front Biosci.2004;9:283-289.
6. Anderson J.M., Rodriguez A., Chang D.T. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials.SeminImmunol. 2008; 20:86-100.
7. Weyhe D., Belyaev O., Muller C., Meurer K., Bauer K., Papapstolou G., Uhl W (2007) Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of the light meshes: a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg 31:234-244.
8. Orestein S.B., Saberski E.R., Kreutzer D.L., Novitski Y.W. (2012) Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight and pore size in mice. J Surg Res 176:423-429.
References:
1. Kobazev V.E. Clinico-morphological rationale of using titanium mesh forreinforcement and soft tissue augmentation in reconstructive maxillofacial surgery. Theses collection: Proceedings of the 6th National Congress on “Plastic surgery, aesthetic medicine and cosmetology”. - 2017 December 10-12, Moscow, Russia - P. 50.
2. Weyhe D., Belyaev O., Muller C., Meurer K., Bauer K., Papapstolou G., Uhl W. (2007) Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of the light meshes: a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg 31:234-244.
3. Asarias J.R., Nguyen P.T., Jr Mings, Gerrich A.P., Pierce L.M. (2001) Influence of mesh materials on the expression of mediators involved in wound healing. Invest Surg 24:87-98.
4. Pascual G., Herna´ndez-Gasco´n B., Rodrı´guez M., Sotomayor S., Pen˜a E., Calvo B., Bello´n J.M. (2012) The long-term behavior of lightweight and heavyweight meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects is determined by host tissue repair process provoked by the mesh. Surgery 152(5):886-895.
5. Diegelmann R.F., Evans M.C. Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic, and delayed healing. Front Biosci. 2004; 9:283-289.
6. Anderson J.M., Rodriguez A., Chang D.T. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials.SeminImmunol. 2008; 20:86-100.
7. Weyhe D., Belyaev O., Muller C., Meurer K., Bauer K., Papapstolou G., Uhl W (2007) Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of the light meshes: a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg 31:234-244.
8. Orestein S.B., Saberski E.R., Kreutzer D.L., Novitski Y.W. (2012) Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight and pore size in mice. J Surg Res 176:423-429.