Современные и перспективные поверхности дентальных имплантатов
Научно-практический журнал Институт Стоматологии №4 (109), декабрь 2025
стр. 101-109
Стоимость:
50 руб.
(в формате 
PDF)
PDF)| В корзину |
Ссылка на elibrary.ru
Аннотация
В работе представлен детальный обзор методов модификации поверхности дентальных имплантатов, направленных на ускорение остеоинтеграции и приживления, снижение риска осложнений и обеспечение максимальной долгосрочной эффективности. Определены ключевые задачи интерфейса «имплантат—хозяин» в первичном послеоперационном периоде и при последующей функциональной нагрузке. Подробно рассмотрены технологии обработки поверхности современных имплантационных систем, клиническая эффективность которых подтверждена долгосрочными исследованиями. Особое внимание уделено новым трендам по созданию многофункциональных биомиметических и «умных» поверхностей, персонализированных имплантатов. Отдельно обсуждаются проблемы стандартизации методов модификации и единства критериев оценки поверхностей, а также сложности прогнозирования долгосрочной эффективности и стабильности покрытий в условиях клинической эксплуатации. Подчёркивается необходимость междисциплинарного подхода для разработки инновационных биоинтерфейсов следующего поколения.
Аннотация (англ)
Surface modification methods of dental implants for accelerate osseointegration and healing, reduce the risk of complications, and ensure maximum long-term effectiveness are presented. Key tasks of the implant-host interface in the initial postoperative period and during subsequent functional loading are identified. Surface treatment technologies for modern implant systems with confirmed long-term clinical efficacy are examined in detail. Particular attention is aimed to new trends in the creation of multifunctional biomimetic and «smart» surfaces and personalized implants. The challenges of standardizing modification methods and uniformity of surface evaluation criteria are discussed separately, as well as the difficulties in predicting the long-term effectiveness and stability of coatings under clinical conditions. The need for an interdisciplinary approach to the development of innovative next-generation biointerfaces is emphasized.
Ключевые Слова
модификация поверхности, дентальные имплантаты, остеоинтеграция, топография поверхности, микрошероховатость, гидрофильность.
Ключевые Слова (англ)
surface modification, dental implants, osseointegration, surface topography, microroughness, hydrophilicity.
Список литературы
1. Chrcanovic B.R., Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. Reasons for failures of oral implants // Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. - 2014. - Vol. 41, № 6. - P. 443-476.
https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12157.
2. Le Guґehennec L., Soueidan A., Layrolle P., Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration // Dental materials. - 2007. - № 23. - P. 844-854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025.
3. Albrektsson T., Buser D., Sennerby L. Crestal bone loss and oral implants // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2012. - Vol. 14, № 6. - P. 783-791. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12013.
4. Derks J., Håkansson J., Wennström JL., Tomasi C., Larsson M., Berglundh T. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a swedish population: early and late implant loss // Journal of Dental Research. - 2015. - Vol. 94, № 3 suppl. - P. 44S-51S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514563077.
5. Elias C.N., Rocha F.A., Nascimento A.L., Coelho P.G. Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants // Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. - 2012. - Vol. 16. - P. 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.010.
6. Albrektsson T., Lars S., Wennerberg A. State of the art of oral implants // Periodontology 2000. - 2008. - Vol. 47 - P. 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2007.00247.x.
7. Smeets R., Stadlinger B., Schwarz F., Beck-Broichsitter B., Jung O., Precht C., Kloss F., Gröbe A., Heiland M., Ebker T. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration // BioMed Research International. - 2016. - Vol. 2016. - Article ID 6285620. - 18 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6285620.
8. Accioni F., Vázquez J., Merinero M., Begines B., Alcudia A. Latest trends in surface modification for dental implantology: innovative developments and analytical applications // Pharmaceutics. - 2022. - Vol. 14, № 455 -38 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020455.
9. Łosiewicz B., Osak P., Nowinska D., Maszybrocka J. Developments in dental implant surface modification // Coatings. - 2025. - Vol. 15, № 109. - 32 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010109.
10. Albrektsson T., Brånemark P.-I., Hansson H.-A. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man // Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. - 1981. - Vol. 52. - P. 155-170. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776.
11. Albrektsson T., Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration // European Spine Journal. - 2001. - Vol. 10 (Suppl. 2). - P. S96-S101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860100282.
12. Albrektsson T., Zarb G.A. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance // International Journal of Prosthodontics. - 1993. - Vol. 6. - P. 95-105.
13. Junker R., Dimakis A., Thoneick M., Jansen J. A. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review // Clinical Oral Implants Research. - 2009. - Vol. 20 (Suppl. 4). - P. 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01777.x.
14. Sotova C., Yanushevich O., Kriheli N., Grigoriev S., Evdokimov V., Kramar O., Nozdrina M., Peretyagin N., Undritsova N., Popelyshkin E. et al. // Dental implants: modern materials and methods of their surface modification. // Materials. - 2023. - Vol. 16. - P. 7383-7427. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237383.
15. Ghodrati H., Goodarzi A., Golrokhian M., Fattahi F., Anzabi R.M., Mohammadikhah M., Sadeghi S., Mirhadi S. A narrative review of recent developments in osseointegration and anti-corrosion of titanium dental implants with nano surface // Bone Report. - 2025. - Vol. 25. - Article № 101846. -12 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2025.101846.
16. Terheyden H., Lang N.P., Bierbaum S., Stadlinger B. Osseointegration -communication of cells // Clinical Oral Implants Research. - 2012. - Vol. 23, № 10. - P. 1127-1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02327.x.
17. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions // International journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. -2010. - Vol. 25 (1). - P. 63-74.
18. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson, T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces // International journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. - 2000. - Vol. 15. - P. 331-344.
19. Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Coelho P.G., Kang B.-S., Sul Y.-T., Albrektsson T. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography // Trends in Biotechnology. - 2010. - Vol.28, № 4. - P. 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.003.
20. Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them // The International Journal of Prosthodontics. -2004. - Vol. 17, № 5. - P. 536-543.
21. Almas K., Smith S., Kutkut A. What is the best micro and macro dental implant topography? // Dental Clinics of North America. - 2019. - Vol. 63. - P. 447-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.010.
22. Brett P.M., Harle J., Salih V., Mihoc R., Olsen I., Jones F.H., et al. Roughness response genes in osteoblasts // Bone. - 2004. - Vol. 35. - P. 124-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.009.
23. Minkiewicz-Zochniak A., Jarzynka S., Iwanska A., Strom K., Iwanczyk B., Bartel M., Mazur M., Pietruczuk-Padzik A., Konieczna M., Augustynowicz-Kopec E., et al. Biofilm Formation on Dental Implant Biomaterials by Staphylococcus Aureus Strains Isolated from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis // Materials. - 2021. - Vol. 14 (8), 2030. - 15 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14082030.
24. Stewart P.S., Costerton J.W. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms // Lancet. - 2001. - Vol. 358. - P. 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1.
25. Mouhyi J., Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Albrektsson T. The peri-implantitis: implant surfaces, microstructure, and physicochemical aspects // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2012. - Vol. 14, № 2. - P. 170-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00244.x.
26. Hetrick E.M.; Schoenfisch M.H. Reducing implant-related infections: active release strategies // Chemical Society Reviews. - 2006. - Vol. 35, № 9. - P. 780-789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b515219b.
27. Abraham C.M. A brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments // The Open Dentistry Journal. - 2014. - Vol. 8, № 1. - Р. 50-55. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601408010050.
28. Ballo A.M., Omar O., Xia W., Palmquist A. Dental implant surfaces: physicochemical properties, biological performance, and trends August / In book: Implant Dentistry - A Rapidly Evolving Practice. - 2011. - P. 19-56. https://doi.org/10.5772/17512.
29. Coelho P.G., Granjeiro J.M., Romanos G.E., Suzuki M., Silva N.R.F., Cardaropoli G., Thompson V.P., Lemons J.E. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces// Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials - 2009. - Vol. 88. - P. 579-596. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31264.
30. Gil F.J., Perez R.A., Olmos J., Herraez-Galindo C., Gutierrez-Perez J.L., Torres-Lagares D. The effect of using Al2O3 and TiO2 in sandblasting of titanium dental implants // Journal of Materials Research - 2022. - Vol. 37, № 16. - P. 2604-2613. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00534-0.
31. Gil F.J., Pérez R.A., Herrero-Climent M., Rizo-Gorrita M., Torres-Lagares D., Gutierrez J.L. Benefits of residual aluminum oxide for sand blasting titanium dental implants: osseointegration and bactericidal effects // Materials. - 2021. - Vol. 15, Article 178. - 15 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010178.
32. Chauhan P., Koul V., Bhatnagar N. Critical role of etching parameters in the evolution of nano micro SLA surface on the Ti6Al4V alloy dental implants // Materials. - 2021. - Vol.14, Article 6344. - 21 p.
33. Giner, L.; Mercade, M.; Torrent, S.; Punset, M.; Perez, R.A.; Delgado, L.M.; Gil, F.J. Double acid etching treatment of dental implants for enhanced biological properties // Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials. - 2018. - Vol. 16. - P. 83-89. https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000376.
34. Dhaliwal J.S.; David S.R.; Zulhilmi N.R.; Knights J.; Junior R.F.A. Contamination of titanium dental implants: a narrative review // SN Applied Sciences. - 2020. - Vol. 2, Article 1011. - 10 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2810-4.
35. Wennerberg A., Galli S., Albrektsson T. Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface // Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. - 2011. - Vol. 3. - P. 59-67. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDEN.S15949.
36. Fischer K., Stenberg T. Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on implant supported full-arch maxillary prostheses. Part 1: sandblasted and acid-etched implants and mucosal tissue // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2012. - Vol. 14, № 6. - P. 808-815. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00389.x.
37. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions // International journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. - 2010. - Vol. 25, № 1. - P. 63-74.
38. Buser D., Janner S.F.M., Wittneben J.-G., Bragger U., Ramseier C.A., Salvi G.E. 10-Year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2012. - Vol. 14, № 6. - P. 839-851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00456.x.
39. Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Corso M.D., Kang B.-S., Leclercq Ph., Mazor Z., Horowitz R.A., Russe Ph., Oh H.-K., Zou D.-R., Shibli J.A., Wang H.-L., Bernard J.-P. and Sammartino G. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 62 dental implant surfaces. Part 3: sand-blasted/acid-etched (SLA type) and related surfaces (Group 2A, main subtractive process) // Poseido. - 2014. - Vol. 2(1). - P. 37-55.
40. Megagen: [сайт]. URL: https://imegagen.com/download/20621 (дата обращения 10.09.25 г.).
41. Rasmusson L, Roos J, Bystedt H. A 10-year follow-up study of titanium dioxide-blasted implants // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2005. - Vol. 7. - P. 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00045.x.
42. Al-Nawas B., Kammerer P.W., Morbach T., Ladwein C., Wegener J., Wagner W. Ten-year retrospective follow-up study of the TiOblast dental implant // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. -2012. - Vol. 14. - P. 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00237.x.
43. Cooper L.F., Zhou Y., Takebe J., Guo J., Abron A., Holmen A., Ellingsen J.E. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants // Biomaterials. - 2006. - Vol. 27, № 6. - P. 926-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.009.
44. Ellingsen J.E., Johansson C.B., Wennerberg A., Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants // The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. - 2004. - Vol. 19, № 5. - P. 659-666.
45. Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Corso M.D., Kang B.-S., Leclercq Ph., Mazor Z., Horowitz R.A., Russe Ph., Oh H.-K., Zou D.-R., Shibli J.A., Wang H.-L., Bernard J.-P., Sammartino G. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 62 dental implant surfaces. Part 4: Resorbable Blasting Media (RBM), Dual Acid-Etched (DAE), Subtractive Impregnated Micro/Nanotextured (SIMN) and related surfaces (Group 2B, other subtractive process) // Poseido. - 2014. - Vol. 2 (1). - P. 57-79.
46. Ormianer Z., Piek D., Livne S., Lavi D., Zafrir G., Palti A., Harel N. Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered implants: 10-year follow-up of delayed and immediate placement of maxillary implants // Implant Dentistry. - 2012. - Vol. 2, № 4. - P. 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31825feb16.
47. Zimmer, поверхность MTX: [сайт]. URL https://www.zimmer-armenia.dental/titanovye-implantaty-zimmer (дата обращения 10.09.25 г.).
48. Sullivan D.Y., Sherwood R.L., Porter S.S. Long-term performance of osseotite implants: A 6-year clinical follow-up // Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry. - 2001. - Vol. 22, № 4. - P. 326-334.
49. Sul Y.T. et al. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition // Biomaterials. - 2002. - Vol. 23, № 2. - P. 491-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00131-4.
50. Milleret V., Lienemann P.S., Gasser A., Bauer S., Ehrbar M., Wennerberg A. Rational design and in vitro characterization of novel dental implant and abutment surfaces for balancing clinical and biological needs // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2019. P. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12736.
51. ФурцевТ.В., ЗеерГ.М. Сравнительноеисследованиеповерхностейтрехтиповимплантатов (TiUnite, SLA, RBM) с контрольнымобразцом, периимплантитом, обработанныхлазером Er;Cr;YSGG длинойволны 2780 нм // Стоматология. - 2019. - T. 98, № 3: - C. 5255. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20199803152 [Furtsev T.V., Zeer G.M. Comparative research of implants with three types of surface processing (TiUnite, SLA, RBM), control, with periimplantitis and processed by 2780 nm Er;Cr;YSGG laser // Stomatology. - 2019. - Vol. 98, № 3. P. 5255. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20199803152].
52. Lee J., Rouhfar L., Beirne O. Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a meta-analytic review // Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. - 2000. - № 58. - P. 1372-1379. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2000.18269.
53. Chang Y.L., Lew D., Park J.B., Keller J.C. Biomechanical and morphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinity //Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. - 1999. - № 57. - P. 1096-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90333-6.
54. Wheeler S.L. Eight-year clinical retrospective study of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implants // The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. - 1996. - Vol. 11, № 3. - P. 340-350.
55. Каталог фирмы ZimVie: [cайт]. URL https://www.zimvie.eu/content/dam/zimvie-corporate/en/dental/literature/zv1520/zv1520_mp1-a_surface_.... (дата обращения 11.09.2025 г.).
56. Thierrer T., Davliakos J.., Keith D, Sanders J., Tarnow D., Rivers J. Five-year prospective clinical evaluation of highly crystalline HA MP-1-coated dental implants // Journal of Oral Implantology. - 2008. - Vol. 34, № 1. - P. 39-46.
57. Peleg M., Garg A., Mazor Z. Healing in smokers versus nonsmoker survival rates for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement // The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. - 2006. - Vol. 21, № 4. - P. 551-559.
58. Asensio G., Vázquez-Lasa B., Rojo L. Achievements in the Topographic Design of Commercial Titanium Dental Implants: Towards Anti-Peri-Implantitis Surfaces // Journal of Clinical Medicine. - 2019. - Vol. 8, № 11, Article 1982. - 28 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111982.
59. Dot, поверхность Bonit: [сайт]. URL https://www.dot-coating.de/index.php/en/coatings/dental/dental-bonit/ (дата обращения 10.09.25 г.).
60. Palarie V., Bicer C., Lehmann K.M., Zahalka M., Draenert F.G., Kämmerer P.W. Early outcome of an implant system with a resorbable adhesive calcium-phosphate coating--a prospective clinical study in partially dentate patients // Clinical Oral Investigations. - 2012. - Vol.16, № 4. - P. 1039-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0598-8.
61. Alfa Gate, поверхность Bioactive: [сайт]. URL https://alfa-gate.com/bioactive-implant/ (дата обращения 11.09.25 г.).
62. Смбатян Б.С., Волков А.В., Омаров Т.В., Ломакин М.В. Изучение остеоинтеграции имплантатов КОНМЕТ с биоактивной поверхностью // Российская стоматология. - 2014. - Т. 7, № 4. - С. 15-24. https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat20147415-24 [Smbatyan B.S., Volkov A.V., Omarov T.V., Lomakin M.V. The study of osteointegration of СONMET implants having the bioactive surface // Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2014. - Vol. 7, № 4. - P. 15-24 (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat20147415-24].
63. Омаров Т.В., Жусев А.И., Ломакин М.В. Результаты клинического использования дентальных имплантатов с модифицированной биоактивной поверхностью // Российская Стоматология. - 2018. - Т. 11, № 3. - С. 13-17. [Omarov T.V., Zhusev A.I., Lomakin M.V. The results of the clinical application of dental implants with the modified biologically active surfaces // Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2018. - Vol. 11, №3. - P. 13-17 (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat20181103113].
64. Алехин А.П., Маркеев А.М., Гудкова С.А., Тетюхин Д.В., Козлов Е.Н. Использование атомарно-слоевого осаждения диоксида титана для придания биоактивных свойств поверхности титановых имплантатов // Институт Стоматологии. - 2010. - № 2. - С. 68-69. [Alekhin A.P., Markeev A.M., Gudkova S.A., Tetyukhin D.V., Kozlov E.N. Application of atomic-layer deposition of titanium dioxide for creation of bioactive properties of titanium implant surface // The Dental Institute. 2010. - № 2. - P. 68-69].
65. Conmet: [сайт]. URL https://conmet.ru/products/dentistry (дата обращения 11.09.2025 г.).
66. Nicolau P., Guerra F., Reis R., et al. 10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface // Quintessence Int. - 2019. - Vol. 50, № 2. - P. 114-1242. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a41664.
67. Straumann, поверхность SLActive: [сайт]. URL https://www.straumann.com/en/discover/slactive.html (датаобращения 11.09.2025 г.).
68. Osstem, поверхность CA: [сайт]. URL https://www.osstem.ru/implants/ts/ca/iii-ca/ (дата обращения 11.09.2025 г.).
69. Osstem, поверхность SOI: [сайт]. URL https://www.osstem.ru/implants/ts/ts-soi/ (дата обращения 11.09.2025 г.).
70. Chae Y.J., et. al. Universal implant surface structure and biological performance analysis // Journal of Future Dentistry. - 2023. - Vol. 3, № 4. - P. 16-19.
71. Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Del Corso M., Kang B.S., Leclercq P., Mazor Z., Horowitz R.A., Russe P., Oh H.K., Zou D.R., Shibli J.A., Wang H.L., Bernard J. P., Sammartino G. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 62 dental implant surfaces. Part 1: description of the Implant Surface Identification Standard (ISIS) codification system // Poseido. - 2014. - Vol. 2 (1). - P. 7-22.
2. Le Guґehennec L., Soueidan A., Layrolle P., Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration // Dental materials. - 2007. - № 23. - P. 844-854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025.
3. Albrektsson T., Buser D., Sennerby L. Crestal bone loss and oral implants // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2012. - Vol. 14, № 6. - P. 783-791. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12013.
4. Derks J., Håkansson J., Wennström JL., Tomasi C., Larsson M., Berglundh T. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a swedish population: early and late implant loss // Journal of Dental Research. - 2015. - Vol. 94, № 3 suppl. - P. 44S-51S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514563077.
5. Elias C.N., Rocha F.A., Nascimento A.L., Coelho P.G. Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants // Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. - 2012. - Vol. 16. - P. 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.010.
6. Albrektsson T., Lars S., Wennerberg A. State of the art of oral implants // Periodontology 2000. - 2008. - Vol. 47 - P. 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2007.00247.x.
7. Smeets R., Stadlinger B., Schwarz F., Beck-Broichsitter B., Jung O., Precht C., Kloss F., Gröbe A., Heiland M., Ebker T. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration // BioMed Research International. - 2016. - Vol. 2016. - Article ID 6285620. - 18 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6285620.
8. Accioni F., Vázquez J., Merinero M., Begines B., Alcudia A. Latest trends in surface modification for dental implantology: innovative developments and analytical applications // Pharmaceutics. - 2022. - Vol. 14, № 455 -38 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020455.
9. Łosiewicz B., Osak P., Nowinska D., Maszybrocka J. Developments in dental implant surface modification // Coatings. - 2025. - Vol. 15, № 109. - 32 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010109.
10. Albrektsson T., Brånemark P.-I., Hansson H.-A. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man // Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. - 1981. - Vol. 52. - P. 155-170. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776.
11. Albrektsson T., Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration // European Spine Journal. - 2001. - Vol. 10 (Suppl. 2). - P. S96-S101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860100282.
12. Albrektsson T., Zarb G.A. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance // International Journal of Prosthodontics. - 1993. - Vol. 6. - P. 95-105.
13. Junker R., Dimakis A., Thoneick M., Jansen J. A. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review // Clinical Oral Implants Research. - 2009. - Vol. 20 (Suppl. 4). - P. 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01777.x.
14. Sotova C., Yanushevich O., Kriheli N., Grigoriev S., Evdokimov V., Kramar O., Nozdrina M., Peretyagin N., Undritsova N., Popelyshkin E. et al. // Dental implants: modern materials and methods of their surface modification. // Materials. - 2023. - Vol. 16. - P. 7383-7427. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237383.
15. Ghodrati H., Goodarzi A., Golrokhian M., Fattahi F., Anzabi R.M., Mohammadikhah M., Sadeghi S., Mirhadi S. A narrative review of recent developments in osseointegration and anti-corrosion of titanium dental implants with nano surface // Bone Report. - 2025. - Vol. 25. - Article № 101846. -12 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2025.101846.
16. Terheyden H., Lang N.P., Bierbaum S., Stadlinger B. Osseointegration -communication of cells // Clinical Oral Implants Research. - 2012. - Vol. 23, № 10. - P. 1127-1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02327.x.
17. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions // International journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. -2010. - Vol. 25 (1). - P. 63-74.
18. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson, T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces // International journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. - 2000. - Vol. 15. - P. 331-344.
19. Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Coelho P.G., Kang B.-S., Sul Y.-T., Albrektsson T. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography // Trends in Biotechnology. - 2010. - Vol.28, № 4. - P. 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.003.
20. Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them // The International Journal of Prosthodontics. -2004. - Vol. 17, № 5. - P. 536-543.
21. Almas K., Smith S., Kutkut A. What is the best micro and macro dental implant topography? // Dental Clinics of North America. - 2019. - Vol. 63. - P. 447-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.010.
22. Brett P.M., Harle J., Salih V., Mihoc R., Olsen I., Jones F.H., et al. Roughness response genes in osteoblasts // Bone. - 2004. - Vol. 35. - P. 124-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.009.
23. Minkiewicz-Zochniak A., Jarzynka S., Iwanska A., Strom K., Iwanczyk B., Bartel M., Mazur M., Pietruczuk-Padzik A., Konieczna M., Augustynowicz-Kopec E., et al. Biofilm Formation on Dental Implant Biomaterials by Staphylococcus Aureus Strains Isolated from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis // Materials. - 2021. - Vol. 14 (8), 2030. - 15 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14082030.
24. Stewart P.S., Costerton J.W. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms // Lancet. - 2001. - Vol. 358. - P. 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1.
25. Mouhyi J., Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Albrektsson T. The peri-implantitis: implant surfaces, microstructure, and physicochemical aspects // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2012. - Vol. 14, № 2. - P. 170-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00244.x.
26. Hetrick E.M.; Schoenfisch M.H. Reducing implant-related infections: active release strategies // Chemical Society Reviews. - 2006. - Vol. 35, № 9. - P. 780-789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b515219b.
27. Abraham C.M. A brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments // The Open Dentistry Journal. - 2014. - Vol. 8, № 1. - Р. 50-55. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601408010050.
28. Ballo A.M., Omar O., Xia W., Palmquist A. Dental implant surfaces: physicochemical properties, biological performance, and trends August / In book: Implant Dentistry - A Rapidly Evolving Practice. - 2011. - P. 19-56. https://doi.org/10.5772/17512.
29. Coelho P.G., Granjeiro J.M., Romanos G.E., Suzuki M., Silva N.R.F., Cardaropoli G., Thompson V.P., Lemons J.E. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces// Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials - 2009. - Vol. 88. - P. 579-596. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31264.
30. Gil F.J., Perez R.A., Olmos J., Herraez-Galindo C., Gutierrez-Perez J.L., Torres-Lagares D. The effect of using Al2O3 and TiO2 in sandblasting of titanium dental implants // Journal of Materials Research - 2022. - Vol. 37, № 16. - P. 2604-2613. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00534-0.
31. Gil F.J., Pérez R.A., Herrero-Climent M., Rizo-Gorrita M., Torres-Lagares D., Gutierrez J.L. Benefits of residual aluminum oxide for sand blasting titanium dental implants: osseointegration and bactericidal effects // Materials. - 2021. - Vol. 15, Article 178. - 15 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010178.
32. Chauhan P., Koul V., Bhatnagar N. Critical role of etching parameters in the evolution of nano micro SLA surface on the Ti6Al4V alloy dental implants // Materials. - 2021. - Vol.14, Article 6344. - 21 p.
33. Giner, L.; Mercade, M.; Torrent, S.; Punset, M.; Perez, R.A.; Delgado, L.M.; Gil, F.J. Double acid etching treatment of dental implants for enhanced biological properties // Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials. - 2018. - Vol. 16. - P. 83-89. https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000376.
34. Dhaliwal J.S.; David S.R.; Zulhilmi N.R.; Knights J.; Junior R.F.A. Contamination of titanium dental implants: a narrative review // SN Applied Sciences. - 2020. - Vol. 2, Article 1011. - 10 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2810-4.
35. Wennerberg A., Galli S., Albrektsson T. Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface // Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. - 2011. - Vol. 3. - P. 59-67. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDEN.S15949.
36. Fischer K., Stenberg T. Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on implant supported full-arch maxillary prostheses. Part 1: sandblasted and acid-etched implants and mucosal tissue // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2012. - Vol. 14, № 6. - P. 808-815. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00389.x.
37. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions // International journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. - 2010. - Vol. 25, № 1. - P. 63-74.
38. Buser D., Janner S.F.M., Wittneben J.-G., Bragger U., Ramseier C.A., Salvi G.E. 10-Year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2012. - Vol. 14, № 6. - P. 839-851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00456.x.
39. Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Corso M.D., Kang B.-S., Leclercq Ph., Mazor Z., Horowitz R.A., Russe Ph., Oh H.-K., Zou D.-R., Shibli J.A., Wang H.-L., Bernard J.-P. and Sammartino G. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 62 dental implant surfaces. Part 3: sand-blasted/acid-etched (SLA type) and related surfaces (Group 2A, main subtractive process) // Poseido. - 2014. - Vol. 2(1). - P. 37-55.
40. Megagen: [сайт]. URL: https://imegagen.com/download/20621 (дата обращения 10.09.25 г.).
41. Rasmusson L, Roos J, Bystedt H. A 10-year follow-up study of titanium dioxide-blasted implants // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2005. - Vol. 7. - P. 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00045.x.
42. Al-Nawas B., Kammerer P.W., Morbach T., Ladwein C., Wegener J., Wagner W. Ten-year retrospective follow-up study of the TiOblast dental implant // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. -2012. - Vol. 14. - P. 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00237.x.
43. Cooper L.F., Zhou Y., Takebe J., Guo J., Abron A., Holmen A., Ellingsen J.E. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants // Biomaterials. - 2006. - Vol. 27, № 6. - P. 926-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.009.
44. Ellingsen J.E., Johansson C.B., Wennerberg A., Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants // The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. - 2004. - Vol. 19, № 5. - P. 659-666.
45. Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Corso M.D., Kang B.-S., Leclercq Ph., Mazor Z., Horowitz R.A., Russe Ph., Oh H.-K., Zou D.-R., Shibli J.A., Wang H.-L., Bernard J.-P., Sammartino G. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 62 dental implant surfaces. Part 4: Resorbable Blasting Media (RBM), Dual Acid-Etched (DAE), Subtractive Impregnated Micro/Nanotextured (SIMN) and related surfaces (Group 2B, other subtractive process) // Poseido. - 2014. - Vol. 2 (1). - P. 57-79.
46. Ormianer Z., Piek D., Livne S., Lavi D., Zafrir G., Palti A., Harel N. Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered implants: 10-year follow-up of delayed and immediate placement of maxillary implants // Implant Dentistry. - 2012. - Vol. 2, № 4. - P. 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31825feb16.
47. Zimmer, поверхность MTX: [сайт]. URL https://www.zimmer-armenia.dental/titanovye-implantaty-zimmer (дата обращения 10.09.25 г.).
48. Sullivan D.Y., Sherwood R.L., Porter S.S. Long-term performance of osseotite implants: A 6-year clinical follow-up // Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry. - 2001. - Vol. 22, № 4. - P. 326-334.
49. Sul Y.T. et al. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition // Biomaterials. - 2002. - Vol. 23, № 2. - P. 491-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00131-4.
50. Milleret V., Lienemann P.S., Gasser A., Bauer S., Ehrbar M., Wennerberg A. Rational design and in vitro characterization of novel dental implant and abutment surfaces for balancing clinical and biological needs // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2019. P. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12736.
51. ФурцевТ.В., ЗеерГ.М. Сравнительноеисследованиеповерхностейтрехтиповимплантатов (TiUnite, SLA, RBM) с контрольнымобразцом, периимплантитом, обработанныхлазером Er;Cr;YSGG длинойволны 2780 нм // Стоматология. - 2019. - T. 98, № 3: - C. 5255. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20199803152 [Furtsev T.V., Zeer G.M. Comparative research of implants with three types of surface processing (TiUnite, SLA, RBM), control, with periimplantitis and processed by 2780 nm Er;Cr;YSGG laser // Stomatology. - 2019. - Vol. 98, № 3. P. 5255. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20199803152].
52. Lee J., Rouhfar L., Beirne O. Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a meta-analytic review // Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. - 2000. - № 58. - P. 1372-1379. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2000.18269.
53. Chang Y.L., Lew D., Park J.B., Keller J.C. Biomechanical and morphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinity //Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. - 1999. - № 57. - P. 1096-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90333-6.
54. Wheeler S.L. Eight-year clinical retrospective study of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implants // The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. - 1996. - Vol. 11, № 3. - P. 340-350.
55. Каталог фирмы ZimVie: [cайт]. URL https://www.zimvie.eu/content/dam/zimvie-corporate/en/dental/literature/zv1520/zv1520_mp1-a_surface_.... (дата обращения 11.09.2025 г.).
56. Thierrer T., Davliakos J.., Keith D, Sanders J., Tarnow D., Rivers J. Five-year prospective clinical evaluation of highly crystalline HA MP-1-coated dental implants // Journal of Oral Implantology. - 2008. - Vol. 34, № 1. - P. 39-46.
57. Peleg M., Garg A., Mazor Z. Healing in smokers versus nonsmoker survival rates for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement // The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. - 2006. - Vol. 21, № 4. - P. 551-559.
58. Asensio G., Vázquez-Lasa B., Rojo L. Achievements in the Topographic Design of Commercial Titanium Dental Implants: Towards Anti-Peri-Implantitis Surfaces // Journal of Clinical Medicine. - 2019. - Vol. 8, № 11, Article 1982. - 28 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111982.
59. Dot, поверхность Bonit: [сайт]. URL https://www.dot-coating.de/index.php/en/coatings/dental/dental-bonit/ (дата обращения 10.09.25 г.).
60. Palarie V., Bicer C., Lehmann K.M., Zahalka M., Draenert F.G., Kämmerer P.W. Early outcome of an implant system with a resorbable adhesive calcium-phosphate coating--a prospective clinical study in partially dentate patients // Clinical Oral Investigations. - 2012. - Vol.16, № 4. - P. 1039-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0598-8.
61. Alfa Gate, поверхность Bioactive: [сайт]. URL https://alfa-gate.com/bioactive-implant/ (дата обращения 11.09.25 г.).
62. Смбатян Б.С., Волков А.В., Омаров Т.В., Ломакин М.В. Изучение остеоинтеграции имплантатов КОНМЕТ с биоактивной поверхностью // Российская стоматология. - 2014. - Т. 7, № 4. - С. 15-24. https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat20147415-24 [Smbatyan B.S., Volkov A.V., Omarov T.V., Lomakin M.V. The study of osteointegration of СONMET implants having the bioactive surface // Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2014. - Vol. 7, № 4. - P. 15-24 (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat20147415-24].
63. Омаров Т.В., Жусев А.И., Ломакин М.В. Результаты клинического использования дентальных имплантатов с модифицированной биоактивной поверхностью // Российская Стоматология. - 2018. - Т. 11, № 3. - С. 13-17. [Omarov T.V., Zhusev A.I., Lomakin M.V. The results of the clinical application of dental implants with the modified biologically active surfaces // Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2018. - Vol. 11, №3. - P. 13-17 (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat20181103113].
64. Алехин А.П., Маркеев А.М., Гудкова С.А., Тетюхин Д.В., Козлов Е.Н. Использование атомарно-слоевого осаждения диоксида титана для придания биоактивных свойств поверхности титановых имплантатов // Институт Стоматологии. - 2010. - № 2. - С. 68-69. [Alekhin A.P., Markeev A.M., Gudkova S.A., Tetyukhin D.V., Kozlov E.N. Application of atomic-layer deposition of titanium dioxide for creation of bioactive properties of titanium implant surface // The Dental Institute. 2010. - № 2. - P. 68-69].
65. Conmet: [сайт]. URL https://conmet.ru/products/dentistry (дата обращения 11.09.2025 г.).
66. Nicolau P., Guerra F., Reis R., et al. 10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface // Quintessence Int. - 2019. - Vol. 50, № 2. - P. 114-1242. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a41664.
67. Straumann, поверхность SLActive: [сайт]. URL https://www.straumann.com/en/discover/slactive.html (датаобращения 11.09.2025 г.).
68. Osstem, поверхность CA: [сайт]. URL https://www.osstem.ru/implants/ts/ca/iii-ca/ (дата обращения 11.09.2025 г.).
69. Osstem, поверхность SOI: [сайт]. URL https://www.osstem.ru/implants/ts/ts-soi/ (дата обращения 11.09.2025 г.).
70. Chae Y.J., et. al. Universal implant surface structure and biological performance analysis // Journal of Future Dentistry. - 2023. - Vol. 3, № 4. - P. 16-19.
71. Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Del Corso M., Kang B.S., Leclercq P., Mazor Z., Horowitz R.A., Russe P., Oh H.K., Zou D.R., Shibli J.A., Wang H.L., Bernard J. P., Sammartino G. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 62 dental implant surfaces. Part 1: description of the Implant Surface Identification Standard (ISIS) codification system // Poseido. - 2014. - Vol. 2 (1). - P. 7-22.
Другие статьи из раздела «Научные исследования в стоматологии»
- Комментарии
Загрузка комментариев...
|
Поделиться:
|
