Биотип десны и методы его оценки (обзор литературы)

Одним из основных факторов, от которого будет зависеть успех стоматологического лечения, является десневой биотип. Различные биотипы по-разному реагируют на воспаление, хирургическое и восстановительное лечение. Следовательно, очень важно определить биотип десны до начала лечения. Особое внимание при планировании лечения должно отдаваться пациентам с тонким биотипом десны. Цель данной статьи рассмотреть характеристики различных десневых биотипов, распространенность различных форм и описать основные методы их идентификации.

One of the main factors on which the success of dental treatment will depend is the gingival biotype. Different biotypes respond differently to inflammation, surgical and reconstructive treatment. Therefore, it is very important to determine the biotype of the gums before starting treatment. Particular attention while planning treatment should be given to patients with a thin gum biotype. The purpose of this article is to consider the characteristics of various gingival biotypes, the prevalence of various forms, and describe the basic methods for their identification.

биотип десны, слизистая оболочка, десна, рецессия десны.

gum biotype, mucous membrane, gums, gum recession.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА/REFERENCES:
1. Денисова Е.Г., Соколова И.И. Биотипы пародонта и рецессия десны: гигиенические аспекты // Експериментальна і клінічна медицина. - 2015. - № 4. - С. 143-147. [Denisova E.G., Sokolova I.I. Periodontal biotypes and gum recession: hygienic aspects // Experimental and clinical medicine. - 2015. - No. 4. - Pp. 143-147.]
2. Жданов Е.В., Февралева А.Ю., Савич О.В. Влияние этиологических факторов развития рецессии на выбор тактики и результаты хирургического лечения // Новое в стоматологии. - 2005. - No 5. - С. 46-55. [Zhdanov E.V., Fevraleva A.Yu., Savich O.V. Influence of etiological factors of recession development on the choice of tactics and results of surgical treatment. Novoe v stomatologii. - 2005. - No. 5. - Pp. 46-55.]
3. Зукелли Д. Пластическая хирургия мягких тканей полости рта. - М.: Азбука, 2014. - 816 с. [Zuchelli D. Plastic surgery of the soft tissues of the oral cavity. - Moscow: Azbuka, 2014. - 816 p.]
4. Зюлькина Л.А., Горина Е.В., Алексеева И.А. Оценка стоматологического статуса у студентов медицинского института ПГУ // Университетское образование (МКУО-2013): сборник статей 17-й Международной научно-методической конференции, посвященной 70-летию образования университета / под ред. В.И.Волчихина, Р.М.Печерской. - 2013. - С. 180-181. [Zyulkina L.A., Gorina E.V., Alekseeva I.A. Assessment of dental status among students of the medical Institute of PSU // University education (ICUO-2013): collection of articles of the 17th International scientific and methodological conference dedicated to the 70th anniversary of the University / ed. V.I.Volchikhin, R.M.Pecherskaya. - 2013. - Pp. 180-181.]
5. Саркисян В.М., Зайратьянц О.В., Панин А.М., Панин М.Г. Варианты строения десны при разных биотипах // Dental Forum. - 2011.-№5(41).-С 105-106. [Sarkisyan V.M., Zayratyants O.V., Panin A.M., Panin M.G. Variants of gum structure at different biotopes // Dental Forum. - 2011. - No. 5 (41). - P. 105-106.]
6. Barriviera, M., et al. (2009) A New Method to Assess and Measure Palatal Masticatory Mucosa by Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography // Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 36, 564-568.
7. Benic GI, Elmasry M, Hammerle CHF. Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:86-96.
8. Braut V., Bornstein M.M., Belser U., Buser D. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall- a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Apr; 31 (2): P. 125-131.
9. Chenyu, H. Mechanotransduction in bone repair and regeneration / H.Chenyu, R.Ogawa. - FASEB J. - 2010. - October. - P. 24.
10. Correia GD, Habib FA, Vogel CJ. Tooth-size discrepancy: a comparison between manual and digital methods. Dental Press J. Orthod. 2014;19(4):107-113.
11. Cuny-Houchmand M, Renaudin S, Leroul M, Planche L, Guehennec L Le, Soueidan A. Gingival biotype assessement: visual inspection relevance and maxillary versus mandibular comparison. Open Dent. J. 2013;7:1-6.
12. De Araujo Junior R.F., Souza T.O., de Medeiros C.A., de Souza L.B., Freitas Mde L., de Lucena H.F., do Socorro Costa Feitosa Alves M., de Araujo A.A. Carvedilol decrease IL-1beta and TNF-alpha, inhibits MMP-2, MMP-9, COX-2, and RANKL expression, and up-regulates OPG in a rat model of periodontitis // PLoS One. 2013. T. 8. № 7. - C. 66-71.
13. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2009;36:428-33.
14. DeLemos A.B. Influence of periodontal biotype on the presence of interdental papillae / A.B. De Lemos, S. Kahn, W.J. Rodrigues, M.O. Barceleiro // Gen. Dent. - 2013. - Sep-Oct; 61(6). - P. 20-24.
15. Esfahrood, Z.R. Gingival biotype: a review / Z.R. Esfahrood, M. Kadkhodazadeh, Ardakani Talebi // Gen. Dent. - 2013. - Jul; 61(4). - P.14- 17
16. Fischer K.R. On the relationship between gingival biotypes and gingival thickness in young Caucasians / K.R. Fischer, T. Richter, M. Kebschull, N. Petersen, S. Fickl // Clin. Oral Implants Res. - 2015. - Aug; 26(8). - P. 865-869.
17. Fischer K.R., Künzlberger A, Donos N, Fickl S, Friedmann A. Gingival biotype revisited-novel classification and assessment tool. Clin. Oral Investig. 2018 Jan;22(1):443-448.
18. Handelman CS, Eltink AP, BeGole E. Quantitative measures of gingival recession and the influence of gender, race, and attrition. Prog Orthod. 2018;19(1):5.
19. Hytham N. Fageeh, Abdullah A. Meshni, Hassan A. Jamal, Reghunathan S. Preethanath, Esam Halbou Correction to: The accuracy and reliability of digital measurements of gingival recession versus conventional methods; BMC oral health, 2019.
20. Jalladaud M1, Lahmi M2, Lallam C3. How to analyze periodontal morphotypes in order to reduce the risk of periodontal recession // Orthod. Fr. 2017 Mar;88(1):95-103.
21. Joshi A, Suragimath G, Zope SA, Ashwinirani SR, Varma SA. Comparison of Gingival Biotype between different Genders based on Measurement of Dentopapillary Complex. J. Clin. Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZC40-ZC45.
22. Joshi N, Agarwal MC, Madan E, Gupta S, Law A. Gingival Biotype and Gingival Bioform: Determining Factors for Periodontal Disease Progression and Treatment Outcome. Int. J. Sci Stud. 2016;4(3):220-25.
23. Jyotsna S., Varsha J.R., Prajakta R.R., Aardra A.P., Deepak G.L., Roshan K.S. Correlation of gingival thickness with gingival width, probing depth, and papillary fill in maxillary anterior teeth in students of a dental college in Navi Mumbai // Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. - 2016. - No 4. - P. 535-538.
24. Kaya Y., Alkan O., Keskin S. An evaluation of the gingival biotype and the width of keratinized gingiva in the mandibular anterior region of individuals with different dental malocclusion groups and levels of crowding // Korean J. Orthod. - 2017. - No 3. - P. 176-185.
25. Lu B., Zhang J., Huang X., Xiao S., Zhang M., Cai Z. Expression of Interleukin-1beta and Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 in Cytolytic and Noncytolytic Enterococcus faecalis-induced Persistent Apical Periodontitis: A Comparative Study in the Rat // J. Endod. 2015. - T. 41. № 8. - C. 12881293.
26. Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):149.
27. Palkovics D, Gera I. The significance of biotype in the predictability of dental-periodontal treatment /Fogorv Sz. 2016 Jun;109(2):45-55.
28. Rathee M, Rao PL, Bhoria M. Prevalence of Gingival Biotypes among Young Dentate North Indian Population: A Biometric Approach. Int J. Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;9(2):104-8
29. Savitha B. , Kharidi L. :Thickness of gingiva in association with age, gender and dental arch location, Published in Journal of clinical periodontology 2005
30. Seba A. Gingival biotype and its clinical significance. - A review the Saudi / À.Seba, K.T.Deepak, R.Ambili et al. // J. Dental Research. - 2014. - ¹ 5. - Ð. 3-7.
31. Shah, R. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to clinical parameters / R.Shah, N.K.Sowmya, D.S.Mehta // Contemp. Clin. Dent. - 2015. - Sep; 6 (Suppl 1). - P. 167-171.
32. Slak B, Daabous A, Bednarz W, Strumban E, Maev RG. Assessment of gingival thickness using an ultrasonic dental system prototype: A comparison to traditional methods. Ann. Anat. 2015;199:98-103.
33. Tan W.L., Wong T.L.T., Wong M.C.M., Lang N.P.A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012; 23 (5): P. 1-21.
34. Ting-Shu S., Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J. Prosthodont. 2015;24(4):313-321.
35. Vera C., De Kok I.J., Reinhold D., Limpiphipatanakorn P., Yap A.K., Tyndall D., Cooper L.F. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec; 27 (6): P. 1514-1519.
36. Wang H.M., Shen J.W., Yu M.F., Chen X.Y., Jiang Q.H., He F.M. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: Р. 1123-1129
37. Zawawi, K.H. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to dental malocclusion / K.H.Zawawi, S.M.Al-Harthi, M.S.Al-Zahrani; Division of Orthodontics, Department of Preventive Dental Science, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia // Saudi Med. J. - 2012. - Jun; 33(6). - P. 671-675.
38. Zweers J. Characteristics of periodontal biotype, its dimensions, associations and prevalence: a systematic review / J. Zweers, R.Z. Thomas, D.E. Slot, A.S. Weisgold, F.G. Van der Weijden // J. Clin. Periodontol. - 2014. - Oct; 41(10). - P. 958-971.