Аннотация (англ)
The use of a surgical template during preoperative planning increases the efficiency and safety of dental implantation. Today, static navigation is quite common, which significantly increases the accuracy of the procedure. Its alternative can be dynamic navigation. The purpose of this experimental study was to compare the accuracy of dental implant placement on jaw models using static navigation with a surgical guide, virtual guide with dynamic visualization, and manual placement.
Список литературы
/ REFERENCES:
1. Colombo M., Mangano C., Mijiritsky E., Krebs M., Hauschild U., Fortin T. Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials. BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 13;17(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0441-y. PMID: 29237427; PMCID: PMC5729259.]
2. Dong Wu, Lin Zhou, Jin Yang, Bao Zhang, Yanjun Lin, Jiang Chen, Wenxiu Huang, Yonghui Chen. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement // International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 2020. doi:10.1186/s40729-020-00272-0.
3. Eftekhar Ashtiani R., Ghasemi Z., Nami M., Mighani F., Namdari M. (2020). Accuracy of static digital surgical guides for dental implants based on the guide system: A systematic review // Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, S2468785520302652. doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2020.10.010.
4. Garcia-Hammaker Sabrina, George Furat M. (2018). Use of a surgical template for minimally invasive second-stage surgery: A dental technique // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, S0022391318303512. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.013.
5. Joda T., Gallucci G.O., Wismeijer D., Zitzmann N.U. Augmented and virtual reality in dental medicine: A systematic review // Comput Biol Med. 2019 May;108:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 15. PMID: 31003184.
6. Kernen F., Kramer J., Wanner L., Wismeijer D., Nelson K., Flügge T. A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery - data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01208-1. PMID: 32912273; PMCID: PMC7488021.
7. Mandelaris G., Stefanelli L., De Groot B. (2018). Dynamic Navigation for Surgical Implant Placement: Overview of Technology, Key Concepts, and a Case ReportDynamic Navigation for Surgical Implant Placement: Overview of Technology, Key Concepts, and a Case Report. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J.: 1995). 39. 614-621; quiz 622.
8. Pellegrino G., Ferri A., Del Fabbro M., Prati C., Gandolfi M.G., Marchetti C. Dynamic Navigation in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Sep-Oct;36(5):e121-e140. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8770. PMID: 34698720.
9. Sparwasser P.M., Schoeb D., Miernik A., Borgmann H. Augmented Reality und Virtual Reality im Operationssaal - Status Quo und Quo vadis [Augmented reality and virtual reality in the operating theatre status quo und quo vadis]. Aktuelle Urol. 2018 Dec;49(6):500-508. German. doi: 10.1055/a-0759-0029. Epub 2018 Dec 6. PMID: 30522160.
10. Tahmaseb A., Wu V., Wismeijer D., Coucke W., Evans C. (2018). The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 29. 416-435. 10.1111/clr.13346.
11. Unsal G.S., Turkyilmaz I., Lakhia S. Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with CAD/CAM surgical guides: A literature review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Apr 1;12(4):e409-e417. doi: 10.4317/jced.55871. PMID: 32382391; PMCID: PMC7195681.
12. Zhou Wenjuan, Liu Zhonghao, Song Liansheng, Kuo Chia-ling, Shafer David M. (2017). Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided implant surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice, S1532338217301902. doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.07.007.